Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

160 \(\Rightarrow\) 160 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
160 \(\Rightarrow\) 160

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
160:	No Dedekind finite set can be mapped onto an aleph. (See [9 E].)
160:	No Dedekind finite set can be mapped onto an aleph. (See [9 E].)

Comment: