We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

169 \(\Rightarrow\) 169
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
169 \(\Rightarrow\) 169

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
169:

There is an uncountable subset of \({\Bbb R}\) without a perfect subset.

169:

There is an uncountable subset of \({\Bbb R}\) without a perfect subset.

Comment:

Back