Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

175 \(\Rightarrow\) 175
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
175 \(\Rightarrow\) 175

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
175:

Transitivity Condition: For all sets \(x\), there is a set \(u\) and a function \(f\) such that \(u\) is transitive and \(f\) is a one to one function from \(x\) onto \(u\).

175:

Transitivity Condition: For all sets \(x\), there is a set \(u\) and a function \(f\) such that \(u\) is transitive and \(f\) is a one to one function from \(x\) onto \(u\).

Comment:

Back