We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

179-epsilon \(\Rightarrow\) 179-epsilon
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
179-epsilon \(\Rightarrow\) 179-epsilon

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
179-epsilon:

Suppose  \(\epsilon > 0\) is an ordinal. \(\forall x\), \(x\in W(\epsilon\)).

179-epsilon:

Suppose  \(\epsilon > 0\) is an ordinal. \(\forall x\), \(x\in W(\epsilon\)).

Comment:

Back