We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

196-alpha \(\Rightarrow\) 196-alpha
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
196-alpha \(\Rightarrow\) 196-alpha

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
196-alpha:

\(\aleph_{\alpha}\) and \(\aleph_{\alpha+1}\) are not both measurable.

196-alpha:

\(\aleph_{\alpha}\) and \(\aleph_{\alpha+1}\) are not both measurable.

Comment:

Back