Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

260 \(\Rightarrow\) 260 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
260 \(\Rightarrow\) 260

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
260:	\(Z(TR\&C,P)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every partially ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element.
260:	\(Z(TR\&C,P)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every partially ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element.

Comment:

Back