Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

264 \(\Rightarrow\) 264 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
264 \(\Rightarrow\) 264

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
264:	\(H(C,P)\): Every connected relation \((X,R)\) contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered set.
264:	\(H(C,P)\): Every connected relation \((X,R)\) contains a \(\subseteq\)-maximal partially ordered set.

Comment: