We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

268 \(\Rightarrow\) 268
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
268 \(\Rightarrow\) 268

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
268:

If \({\cal L}\)  is  a  lattice  isomorphic  to the  lattice  of subalgebras of some unary universal algebra (a unary universal algebra is one with only unary or nullary operations) and \(\alpha \) is an automorphism of \({\cal L}\) of order 2 (that is, \(\alpha ^{2}\)  is  the  identity) then there is a unary algebra \(\frak A\)  and an isomorphism \(\rho \) from \({\cal L}\) onto the lattice of subalgebras of \(\frak A^{2}\) with \[\rho(\alpha(x))=(\rho(x))^{-1} (= \{(s,t) : (t,s)\in\rho(x)\})\] for all \(x\in  {\cal L}\).

268:

If \({\cal L}\)  is  a  lattice  isomorphic  to the  lattice  of subalgebras of some unary universal algebra (a unary universal algebra is one with only unary or nullary operations) and \(\alpha \) is an automorphism of \({\cal L}\) of order 2 (that is, \(\alpha ^{2}\)  is  the  identity) then there is a unary algebra \(\frak A\)  and an isomorphism \(\rho \) from \({\cal L}\) onto the lattice of subalgebras of \(\frak A^{2}\) with \[\rho(\alpha(x))=(\rho(x))^{-1} (= \{(s,t) : (t,s)\in\rho(x)\})\] for all \(x\in  {\cal L}\).

Comment:

Back