We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
274 \(\Rightarrow\) 274 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
274: | There is a cardinal number \(x\) and an \(n\in\omega\) such that \(\neg(x\) adj\(^n\, x^2)\). (The expression ``\(x\) adj\(^n\, ya\)" means there are cardinals \(z_0,\ldots, z_n\) such that \(z_0 = x\) and \(z_n = y\) and for all \(i,\ 0\le i < n,\ z_i< z_{i+1}\) and if \(z_i < z\le z_{i+1}\), then \(z = z_{i+1}.)\) (Compare with [0 A]). |
274: | There is a cardinal number \(x\) and an \(n\in\omega\) such that \(\neg(x\) adj\(^n\, x^2)\). (The expression ``\(x\) adj\(^n\, ya\)" means there are cardinals \(z_0,\ldots, z_n\) such that \(z_0 = x\) and \(z_n = y\) and for all \(i,\ 0\le i < n,\ z_i< z_{i+1}\) and if \(z_i < z\le z_{i+1}\), then \(z = z_{i+1}.)\) (Compare with [0 A]). |
Comment: