Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

289 \(\Rightarrow\) 289
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
289 \(\Rightarrow\) 289

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
289:

If \(S\) is a set of subsets of a countable set and \(S\) is closed under chain unions, then \(S\) has a \(\subseteq\)-maximal element.

289:

If \(S\) is a set of subsets of a countable set and \(S\) is closed under chain unions, then \(S\) has a \(\subseteq\)-maximal element.

Comment:

Back