We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
289 \(\Rightarrow\) 289 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
289: | If \(S\) is a set of subsets of a countable set and \(S\) is closed under chain unions, then \(S\) has a \(\subseteq\)-maximal element. |
289: | If \(S\) is a set of subsets of a countable set and \(S\) is closed under chain unions, then \(S\) has a \(\subseteq\)-maximal element. |
Comment: