We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
308-p \(\Rightarrow\) 0 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
308-p: | If \(p\) is a prime and if \(\{G_y: y\in Y\}\) is a set of finite groups, then the weak direct product \(\prod_{y\in Y}G_y\) has a maximal \(p\)-subgroup. |
0: | \(0 = 0\). |
Comment: