We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

379 \(\Rightarrow\) 379
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
379 \(\Rightarrow\) 379

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
379:

\(PKW(\infty,\infty,\infty)\): For every infinite family \(X\) of sets each of which has at least two elements, there is an infinite subfamily \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in Y\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(y\).

379:

\(PKW(\infty,\infty,\infty)\): For every infinite family \(X\) of sets each of which has at least two elements, there is an infinite subfamily \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in Y\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(y\).

Comment:

Back