We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
26 \(\Rightarrow\) 26 | Le¸cons sur la th´eorie des fonctions, Borel, [1898] |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
26: | \(UT(\aleph_{0},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): The union of denumerably many sets each of power \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
26: | \(UT(\aleph_{0},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): The union of denumerably many sets each of power \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
Comment: