We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 22 \(\Rightarrow\) 22 | Le¸cons sur la th´eorie des fonctions, Borel, [1898] Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, [1982] |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 22: | \(UT(2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): If every member of an infinite set of cardinality \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\), then the union has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
| 22: | \(UT(2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): If every member of an infinite set of cardinality \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\), then the union has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
Comment: