We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 25 |
Independence results in set theory by Cohen's method II, Levy, A. 1963, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. All uncountable cardinals can be singular, Gitik, M. 1980, Israel J. Math. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
25: | \(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\). |
25: | \(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\). |
Comment: