We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

108 \(\Rightarrow\) 108
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
108 \(\Rightarrow\) 108 Regular cardinals in models of \(ZF\), Gitik, M. 1985, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
108:

There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\) is not the union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets.

108:

There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\) is not the union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets.

Comment:

Back