We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
97 \(\Rightarrow\) 97 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 154 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
97: | Cardinal Representatives: For every set \(A\) there is a function \(c\) with domain \({\cal P}(A)\) such that for all \(x, y\in {\cal P}(A)\), (i) \(c(x) = c(y) \leftrightarrow x\approx y\) and (ii) \(c(x)\approx x\). Jech [1973b] p 154. |
97: | Cardinal Representatives: For every set \(A\) there is a function \(c\) with domain \({\cal P}(A)\) such that for all \(x, y\in {\cal P}(A)\), (i) \(c(x) = c(y) \leftrightarrow x\approx y\) and (ii) \(c(x)\approx x\). Jech [1973b] p 154. |
Comment: