Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

44 \(\Rightarrow\) 44 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
44 \(\Rightarrow\) 44	The interdependence of certain consequences of the axiom of choice, Levy, A. 1964, Fund. Math.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
44:	\(DC(\aleph _{1})\): Given a relation \(R\) such that for every subset \(Y\) of a set \(X\) with \(\|Y\| < \aleph_{1}\) there is an \(x \in X\) with \(Y \mathrel R x\), then there is a function \(f: \aleph_{1} \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\beta < \aleph_{1}) (\{f(\gamma ): \gamma < b \} \mathrel R f(\beta))\).
44:	\(DC(\aleph _{1})\): Given a relation \(R\) such that for every subset \(Y\) of a set \(X\) with \(\|Y\| < \aleph_{1}\) there is an \(x \in X\) with \(Y \mathrel R x\), then there is a function \(f: \aleph_{1} \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\beta < \aleph_{1}) (\{f(\gamma ): \gamma < b \} \mathrel R f(\beta))\).

Comment:

Back