Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

58 \(\Rightarrow\) 58
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
58 \(\Rightarrow\) 58 A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
58:

There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(\aleph(2^{\aleph_{\alpha }})\neq\aleph_{\alpha +1}\). (\(\aleph(2^{\aleph_{\alpha}})\) is Hartogs' aleph, the least \(\aleph\) not \(\le 2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\).)
Mathias [1979], p 126.

58:

There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(\aleph(2^{\aleph_{\alpha }})\neq\aleph_{\alpha +1}\). (\(\aleph(2^{\aleph_{\alpha}})\) is Hartogs' aleph, the least \(\aleph\) not \(\le 2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\).)
Mathias [1979], p 126.

Comment:

Back