Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

99 \(\Rightarrow\) 99
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
99 \(\Rightarrow\) 99 Axiomatic treatment of rank in infinite sets, Rado, R. 1949, Canad. J. Math.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
99:

Rado's Selection Lemma: Let \(\{K(\lambda): \lambda \in\Lambda\}\) be a family  of finite subsets (of \(X\)) and suppose for each finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a function \(\gamma(S): S \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\lambda\in S)(\gamma(S)(\lambda)\in K(\lambda))\).  Then there is an \(f: \Lambda\rightarrow X\) such that for every finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a finite \(T\) such that \(S\subseteq T\subseteq\Lambda\) and such that \(f\) and \(\gamma (T)\) agree on S.

99:

Rado's Selection Lemma: Let \(\{K(\lambda): \lambda \in\Lambda\}\) be a family  of finite subsets (of \(X\)) and suppose for each finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a function \(\gamma(S): S \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\lambda\in S)(\gamma(S)(\lambda)\in K(\lambda))\).  Then there is an \(f: \Lambda\rightarrow X\) such that for every finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a finite \(T\) such that \(S\subseteq T\subseteq\Lambda\) and such that \(f\) and \(\gamma (T)\) agree on S.

Comment:

Back