Implications

• Implications Home
• Code 1 Implications
• Code 2 Implications
• Code 3 Implications
• Code 4 Implications
• Code 5 Implications
• Code 6 Implications
• Complete List
• Search

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

32 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 32	L’axiome de M. Zermelo et son rˆole dans la th´eorie des ensembles et l’analyse, Sierpi'nski, W. 1918, Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie Cl. Math. Nat.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
32:	\(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets  has a choice function.
32:	\(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets  has a choice function.

Comment: