Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

62 \(\Rightarrow\) 18
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 clear
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 80 clear
80 \(\Rightarrow\) 18 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

10:

\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

80:

\(C(\aleph_{0},2)\):  Every denumerable set of  pairs has  a  choice function.

18:

\(PUT(\aleph_{0},2,\aleph_{0})\):  The union of a denumerable family of pairwise disjoint pairs has a denumerable subset.

Comment:

Back