Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

317 \(\Rightarrow\) 226
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
317 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 Limitations on the Fraenkel-Mostowski method of independence proofs, Howard, P. 1973, J. Symbolic Logic
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 226 Variants of Rado's selection lemma and their applications, Rav, Y. 1977, Math. Nachr.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
317:

Weak Sikorski Theorem:  If \(B\) is a complete, well orderable Boolean algebra and \(f\) is a homomorphism of the Boolean algebra \(A'\) into \(B\) where \(A'\) is a subalgebra of the Boolean algebra \(A\), then \(f\) can be extended to a homomorphism of \(A\) into \(B\).
14:

BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal.

226:

Let \(R\) be a commutative ring with identity, \(B\) a proper subring containing 1 and \(q\) a prime ideal in \(B\). Then there is a subring \(A\) of \(R\) and a prime ideal \(p\) in \(A\) such that

  1. \(B\subseteq A\)
  2. \(q = B\cap p\)
  3. \(R - p\) is multiplicatively closed and
  4. if \(A\neq R\),
then \(R - A\) is multiplicatively closed.

Comment:

Back