Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

345 \(\Rightarrow\) 270
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
345 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 270 Restricted versions of the compactness theorem, Kolany, A. 1991, Rep. Math. Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
345:

Rasiowa-Sikorski Axiom:  If \((B,\land,\lor)\) is a Boolean algebra, \(a\) is a non-zero element of \(B\), and \(\{X_n: n\in\omega\}\) is a denumerable set of subsets of \(B\) then there is a maximal filter \(F\) of \(B\) such that \(a\in F\) and for each \(n\in\omega\), if \(X_n\subseteq F\) and \(\bigwedge X_n\) exists then \(\bigwedge X_n \in F\).

14:

BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal.

270:

\(CT_{\hbox{fin}}\): The compactness theorem for propositional logic restricted to sets of formulas in which each variable occurs only in a finite number of formulas.

Comment:

Back