We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
345 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 |
Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal |
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 99 |
Variants of Rado's selection lemma and their applications, Rav, Y. 1977, Math. Nachr. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
345: | Rasiowa-Sikorski Axiom: If \((B,\land,\lor)\) is a Boolean algebra, \(a\) is a non-zero element of \(B\), and \(\{X_n: n\in\omega\}\) is a denumerable set of subsets of \(B\) then there is a maximal filter \(F\) of \(B\) such that \(a\in F\) and for each \(n\in\omega\), if \(X_n\subseteq F\) and \(\bigwedge X_n\) exists then \(\bigwedge X_n \in F\). |
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
99: | Rado's Selection Lemma: Let \(\{K(\lambda): \lambda \in\Lambda\}\) be a family of finite subsets (of \(X\)) and suppose for each finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a function \(\gamma(S): S \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\lambda\in S)(\gamma(S)(\lambda)\in K(\lambda))\). Then there is an \(f: \Lambda\rightarrow X\) such that for every finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a finite \(T\) such that \(S\subseteq T\subseteq\Lambda\) and such that \(f\) and \(\gamma (T)\) agree on S. |
Comment: