Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

345 \(\Rightarrow\) 226
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
345 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 226 Variants of Rado's selection lemma and their applications, Rav, Y. 1977, Math. Nachr.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
345:

Rasiowa-Sikorski Axiom:  If \((B,\land,\lor)\) is a Boolean algebra, \(a\) is a non-zero element of \(B\), and \(\{X_n: n\in\omega\}\) is a denumerable set of subsets of \(B\) then there is a maximal filter \(F\) of \(B\) such that \(a\in F\) and for each \(n\in\omega\), if \(X_n\subseteq F\) and \(\bigwedge X_n\) exists then \(\bigwedge X_n \in F\).

14:

BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal.

226:

Let \(R\) be a commutative ring with identity, \(B\) a proper subring containing 1 and \(q\) a prime ideal in \(B\). Then there is a subring \(A\) of \(R\) and a prime ideal \(p\) in \(A\) such that

  1. \(B\subseteq A\)
  2. \(q = B\cap p\)
  3. \(R - p\) is multiplicatively closed and
  4. if \(A\neq R\),
then \(R - A\) is multiplicatively closed.

Comment:

Back