We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
407 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 |
Effective equivalents of the Rasiowa-Sikorski lemma, Bacsich, P. D. 1972b, J. London Math. Soc. Ser. 2. |
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 63 | clear |
63 \(\Rightarrow\) 70 | clear |
70 \(\Rightarrow\) 206 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
407: | Let \(B\) be a Boolean algebra, \(b\) a non-zero element of \(B\) and \(\{A_i: i\in\omega\}\) a sequence of subsets of \(B\) such that for each \(i\in\omega\), \(A_i\) has a supremum \(a_i\). Then there exists an ultrafilter \(D\) in \(B\) such that \(b\in D\) and, for each \(i\in\omega\), if \(a_i\in D\), then \(D\cap\ A_i\neq\emptyset\). |
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
63: |
\(SPI\): Weak ultrafilter principle: Every infinite set has a non-trivial ultrafilter.
|
70: | There is a non-trivial ultrafilter on \(\omega\). Jech [1973b], prob 5.24. |
206: | The existence of a non-principal ultrafilter: There exists an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal ultrafilter on \(X\). |
Comment: