We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
4 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 | clear |
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 | Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, 322 |
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 288-n | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
4: | Every infinite set is the union of some disjoint family of denumerable subsets. (Denumerable means \(\cong \aleph_0\).) |
9: | Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
288-n: | If \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(\aleph_0,n)\): Every denumerable set of \(n\)-element sets has a choice function. |
Comment: