We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
345 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 |
Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal |
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 63 | clear |
63 \(\Rightarrow\) 70 | clear |
70 \(\Rightarrow\) 206 | clear |
206 \(\Rightarrow\) 223 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
345: | Rasiowa-Sikorski Axiom: If \((B,\land,\lor)\) is a Boolean algebra, \(a\) is a non-zero element of \(B\), and \(\{X_n: n\in\omega\}\) is a denumerable set of subsets of \(B\) then there is a maximal filter \(F\) of \(B\) such that \(a\in F\) and for each \(n\in\omega\), if \(X_n\subseteq F\) and \(\bigwedge X_n\) exists then \(\bigwedge X_n \in F\). |
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
63: |
\(SPI\): Weak ultrafilter principle: Every infinite set has a non-trivial ultrafilter.
|
70: | There is a non-trivial ultrafilter on \(\omega\). Jech [1973b], prob 5.24. |
206: | The existence of a non-principal ultrafilter: There exists an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal ultrafilter on \(X\). |
223: | There is an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal measure on \(\cal P(X)\). |
Comment: