Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

317 \(\Rightarrow\) 241
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
317 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 Limitations on the Fraenkel-Mostowski method of independence proofs, Howard, P. 1973, J. Symbolic Logic
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 233 Algebraic closures without choice, Banaschewski, B. 1992, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math.
233 \(\Rightarrow\) 242 clear
242 \(\Rightarrow\) 241 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
317:

Weak Sikorski Theorem:  If \(B\) is a complete, well orderable Boolean algebra and \(f\) is a homomorphism of the Boolean algebra \(A'\) into \(B\) where \(A'\) is a subalgebra of the Boolean algebra \(A\), then \(f\) can be extended to a homomorphism of \(A\) into \(B\).
14:

BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal.

233:

Artin-Schreier theorem: If a field has an algebraic closure it is unique up to isomorphism.

242:

There is, up to an isomorphism, at most one algebraic closure of \({\Bbb Q}\).

241:

Every algebraic closure of \(\Bbb Q\) has a real closed subfield.

Comment:

Back