We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
407 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 |
Effective equivalents of the Rasiowa-Sikorski lemma, Bacsich, P. D. 1972b, J. London Math. Soc. Ser. 2. |
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 270 |
Restricted versions of the compactness theorem, Kolany, A. 1991, Rep. Math. Logic |
270 \(\Rightarrow\) 271-n |
Restricted versions of the compactness theorem, Kolany, A. 1991, Rep. Math. Logic |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
407: | Let \(B\) be a Boolean algebra, \(b\) a non-zero element of \(B\) and \(\{A_i: i\in\omega\}\) a sequence of subsets of \(B\) such that for each \(i\in\omega\), \(A_i\) has a supremum \(a_i\). Then there exists an ultrafilter \(D\) in \(B\) such that \(b\in D\) and, for each \(i\in\omega\), if \(a_i\in D\), then \(D\cap\ A_i\neq\emptyset\). |
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
270: | \(CT_{\hbox{fin}}\): The compactness theorem for propositional logic restricted to sets of formulas in which each variable occurs only in a finite number of formulas. |
271-n: | If \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(CT_{n}\): The compactness theorem for propositional logic restricted to sets of formulas in which each variable occurs in at most \(n\) formulas. |
Comment: