We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
345 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 |
Topologie, Analyse Nonstandard et Axiome du Choix, Morillon, M. 1988, Universit\'e Blaise-Pascal |
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 311 | The Banach-Tarski Paradox, Wagon, [1985] |
311 \(\Rightarrow\) 313 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
345: | Rasiowa-Sikorski Axiom: If \((B,\land,\lor)\) is a Boolean algebra, \(a\) is a non-zero element of \(B\), and \(\{X_n: n\in\omega\}\) is a denumerable set of subsets of \(B\) then there is a maximal filter \(F\) of \(B\) such that \(a\in F\) and for each \(n\in\omega\), if \(X_n\subseteq F\) and \(\bigwedge X_n\) exists then \(\bigwedge X_n \in F\). |
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
311: | Abelian groups are amenable. (\(G\) is amenable if there is a finitely additive measure \(\mu\) on \(\cal P(G)\) such that \(\mu(G)=1\) and \(\forall A\subseteq G, \forall g\in G\), \(\mu(gA)=\mu(A)\).) |
313: | \(\Bbb Z\) (the set of integers under addition) is amenable. (\(G\) is {\it amenable} if there is a finitely additive measure \(\mu\) on \(\cal P(G)\) such that \(\mu(G) = 1\) and \(\forall A\subseteq G, \forall g\in G\), \(\mu(gA)=\mu(A)\).) |
Comment: