Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

15 \(\Rightarrow\) 198
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
15 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 53 problem 4.12
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 198 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
15:

\(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every  set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)).  

30:

Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered.

198:

For every set \(S\), if the only linearly orderable subsets of \(S\) are the finite subsets of \(S\), then either \(S\) is finite or \(S\) has an amorphous subset.

Comment:

Back