We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
15 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 53 problem 4.12 |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 | clear |
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 33-n | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
15: | \(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)). |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
121: | \(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
33-n: | If \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(LO,n)\): Every linearly ordered set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
Comment: