Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

15 \(\Rightarrow\) 73 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
15 \(\Rightarrow\) 30	The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 53 problem 4.12
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62	clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 132	Sequential compactness and the axiom of choice, Brunner, N. 1983b, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
132 \(\Rightarrow\) 73	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
15:	\(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(\|A\|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)).
30:	Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered.
62:	\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.
132:	\(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\): Every infinite family of finite sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function.
73:	\(\forall n\in\omega\), \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): For every \(n\in\omega\), if \(C\) is an infinite family of \(n\) element sets, then \(C\) has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b]

Comment:

Back