We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
			
| Implication | Reference | 
|---|---|
| 15 \(\Rightarrow\) 296 | 
							 	The dense linear ordering principle, Pincus,  D. 1997, J. Symbolic Logic  | 
					
| 296 \(\Rightarrow\) 404 | clear | 
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement | 
|---|---|
| 15: | \(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)).  | 
					
| 296: | Part-\(\infty\): Every infinite set is the disjoint union of infinitely many infinite sets.  | 
					
| 404: | Every infinite set can be partitioned into infinitely many sets, each of which has at least two elements. Ash [1983].  | 
					
Comment: