We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
15 \(\Rightarrow\) 376 | clear |
376 \(\Rightarrow\) 167 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
15: | \(KW(\infty,\infty)\) (KW), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle: For every set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 81(\(n\)). |
376: | Restricted Kinna Wagner Principle: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for every \(z\subseteq Y\), if \(|z| \ge 2\) then \(f(z)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(z\). |
167: | \(PKW(\aleph_{0},\ge 2,\infty)\), Partial Kinna-Wagner Principle: For every denumerable family \(F\) such that for all \(x\in F\), \(|x|\ge 2\), there is an infinite subset \(H\subseteq F\) and a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in H\), \(\emptyset\neq f(x) \subsetneq x\). |
Comment: