Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

152 \(\Rightarrow\) 199(\(n\))
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
152 \(\Rightarrow\) 4 Russell's alternative to the axiom of choice, Howard, P. 1992, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math.
note-27
note-27
note-27
4 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 clear
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 13 clear
13 \(\Rightarrow\) 199(\(n\)) clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
152:

\(D_{\aleph_{0}}\): Every non-well-orderable set is the union of a pairwise disjoint, well orderable family of denumerable sets.  (See note 27 for \(D_{\kappa}\), \(\kappa\) a well ordered cardinal.)

4:

Every infinite set is the union of some disjoint family of denumerable subsets. (Denumerable means \(\cong \aleph_0\).)

9:

Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.

13:

Every Dedekind finite subset of \({\Bbb R}\) is finite.

199(\(n\)):

(For \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\)) If all \(\varSigma^{1}_{n}\), Dedekind finite subsets of \({}^{\omega }\omega\) are finite, then all \(\varPi^1_n\) Dedekind finite subsets of \({}^{\omega} \omega\) are finite.

Comment:

Back