We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
22 \(\Rightarrow\) 26 | clear |
26 \(\Rightarrow\) 209 | note-72 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
22: | \(UT(2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): If every member of an infinite set of cardinality \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\), then the union has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
26: | \(UT(\aleph_{0},2^{\aleph_{0}},2^{\aleph_{0}})\): The union of denumerably many sets each of power \(2^{\aleph _{0}}\) has power \(2^{\aleph_{0}}\). |
209: | There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that for all \(X\), if \(X\) is a denumerable union of denumerable sets then \({\cal P}(X)\) cannot be partitioned into \(\aleph_{\alpha}\) non-empty sets. |
Comment: