We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 | clear |
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, [1973b] |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
25: | \(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\). |
34: | \(\aleph_{1}\) is regular. |
38: | \({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets. |
Comment: