We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 | clear |
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 104 | clear |
104 \(\Rightarrow\) 182 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
25: | \(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\). |
34: | \(\aleph_{1}\) is regular. |
104: | There is a regular uncountable aleph. Jech [1966b], p 165 prob 11.26. |
182: | There is an aleph whose cofinality is greater than \(\aleph_{0}\). |
Comment: