Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

4 \(\Rightarrow\) 73 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
4 \(\Rightarrow\) 9	clear
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 17	The independence of Ramsey's theorem, Kleinberg, E.M. 1969, J. Symbolic Logic
17 \(\Rightarrow\) 132	Amorphe Potenzen kompakter Raume, Brunner, N. 1984b, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforschung
132 \(\Rightarrow\) 73	clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
4:	Every infinite set is the union of some disjoint family of denumerable subsets. (Denumerable means \(\cong \aleph_0\).)
9:	Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.
17:	Ramsey's Theorem I: If \(A\) is an infinite set and the family of all 2 element subsets of \(A\) is partitioned into 2 sets \(X\) and \(Y\), then there is an infinite subset \(B\subseteq A\) such that all 2 element subsets of \(B\) belong to \(X\) or all 2 element subsets of \(B\) belong to \(Y\). (Also, see Form 325.), Jech [1973b], p 164 prob 11.20.
132:	\(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\): Every infinite family of finite sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function.
73:	\(\forall n\in\omega\), \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): For every \(n\in\omega\), if \(C\) is an infinite family of \(n\) element sets, then \(C\) has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b]

Comment:

Back