We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
49 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 | clear |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 | clear |
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 80 | clear |
80 \(\Rightarrow\) 389 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
49: | Order Extension Principle: Every partial ordering can be extended to a linear ordering. Tarski [1924], p 78. |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
80: | \(C(\aleph_{0},2)\): Every denumerable set of pairs has a choice function. |
389: | \(C(\aleph_0,2,\cal P({\Bbb R}))\): Every denumerable family of two element subsets of \(\cal P({\Bbb R})\) has a choice function. \ac{Keremedis} \cite{1999b}. |
Comment: