We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 49 |
A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar. |
49 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 | clear |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 83 | note-81 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
49: | Order Extension Principle: Every partial ordering can be extended to a linear ordering. Tarski [1924], p 78. |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
83: | \(E(I,II)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]: \(T\)-finite is equivalent to finite. |
Comment: