Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

50 \(\Rightarrow\) 83
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
50 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar.
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 49 A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar.
49 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 clear
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 83 note-81

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
50:

Sikorski's  Extension Theorem: Every homomorphism of a subalgebra \(B\) of a Boolean algebra \(A\) into a complete Boolean algebra \(B'\) can be extended to a homomorphism of \(A\) into \(B'\). Sikorski [1964], p. 141.

14:

BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal.

49:

Order Extension Principle: Every partial ordering can be extended to a linear ordering.  Tarski [1924], p 78.

30:

Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered.

83:

\(E(I,II)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]: \(T\)-finite is equivalent to finite.

Comment:

Back