We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
295 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 |
"Dense orderings, partitions, and weak forms of choice", Gonzalez, C. 1995a, Fund. Math. |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 378 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
295: | DO: Every infinite set has a dense linear ordering. |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
378: | Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function. |
Comment: