We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 64 |
Amorphe Potenzen kompakter Raume, Brunner, N. 1984b, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforschung |
64 \(\Rightarrow\) 390 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
64: | \(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.) |
390: | Every infinite set can be partitioned either into two infinite sets or infinitely many sets, each of which has at least two elements. Ash [1983]. |
Comment: