Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

295 \(\Rightarrow\) 122
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
295 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 "Dense orderings, partitions, and weak forms of choice", Gonzalez, C. 1995a, Fund. Math.
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 clear
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
295:

DO:  Every infinite set has a dense linear ordering.

30:

Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

121:

\(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

122:

\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

Comment:

Back