We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 49 |
A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar. |
49 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 | clear |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 | clear |
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 401 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
49: | Order Extension Principle: Every partial ordering can be extended to a linear ordering. Tarski [1924], p 78. |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
121: | \(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
401: | \(KW(LO,<\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a linearly ordered set of finite sets: For every linearly ordered set of finite sets \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
Comment: