Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

30 \(\Rightarrow\) 48-K
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 clear
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 clear
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 48-K clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
30:

Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

121:

\(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

122:

\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

48-K:

If \(K\) is a finite subset of \(\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(WO,K)\): For every \(n\in K,\) \(C(WO,n)\).

Comment:

Back